[ad_1]
This presentation (“Presentation”) is being issued by Grid Metals Corp. (the “Company” or “Grid “) for information purposes only. Reliance on this Presentation for the purpose of engaging in any investment activity may expose an individual to a significant risk of losing all of the property or other assets invested.
The Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) of the Mayville-Makwa Project dated April 30, 2014 was prepared by Roscoe Postle Associates Inc. (RPA). The PEA includes the use of inferred mineral resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves. The study is preliminary in nature and there is no assurance the mining, metal production or cash flow scenarios outlined in this report would ever be realized. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.
Cautionary Statements Concerning Forward-Looking Statements
This Presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and forward-looking information within the meaning of the Securities Act (Ontario) (together, “forward-looking statements”). Such forward-looking statements include management’s assessment of future plans and operations and are based on current expectations, estimates, projections, assumptions and beliefs, which may prove to be incorrect. Some of the forward-looking statements may be identified by words such as “may”, “will”, “should”, “could”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “expect”, “intend”, “potential”, “continue”, “target”, “estimate”, “proposed”, “preliminary” and similar expressions. Such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the Company’s plans for its mineral projects in Manitoba, production capacity and timing, mining and processing methods, by-products, product pricing, capital and operating cost estimates, project economics, future plans, the availability of financing, the growth in the electric vehicle market and its impact on the demand for nickel and copper, and future supply of nickel and copper.
By their nature, forward-looking statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, risks and uncertainties relating to potential political risks involving the Company’s operations in a foreign jurisdiction, uncertainty of production and costs estimates and the potential for unexpected costs and expenses, physical risks inherent in mining operations, currency fluctuations, fluctuations in the price of nickel, copper and other metals, completion of economic evaluations, changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined, the inability or failure to obtain adequate financing on a timely basis, and other risks and uncertainties, including those described in the most recently filed Company’s Management Discussion and Analysis and Material Change Reports filed with the Canadian Securities Administrators and available for public disclosure at www.sedar.com. Forward-looking statements contained in this Presentation regarding past trends or activities should not be taken as a representation that such trends or activities will continue in the future. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Presentation.
Cautionary Note to U.S. Readers Regarding Estimates of Resources
This Presentation uses the terms “measured” and “indicated” mineral resources and “inferred” mineral resources. The Company advises U.S. investors that while these terms are recognized and required by Canadian securities administrators, they are not recognized by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The estimation of “measured” and “indicated” mineral resources involves greater uncertainty as to their existence and economic feasibility than the estimation of proven and probable reserves. The estimation of “inferred” resources involves far greater uncertainty as to their existence and economic viability than the estimation of other categories of resources. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of a “measured”, “indicated” or “inferred” mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category.
Technical information contained in this Presentation has been reviewed by Dave Peck, P.Geo., a Qualified Person under the meaning of National Instrument 43-101. Drill widths noted in presentation are apparent width unless otherwise stated.
[ad_2]
Source link
