The court has directed Sebi to hold an inquiry against its officers on why the delay happened and submit its report.
Securities lawyers said this is probably the first time the apex court has asked Sebi to hold an inquiry against its officers for inordinate delay in issuing show cause notices. This case could have a bearing on several other identical cases pending before the Supreme Court, they said.
“The appellant (Sebi) will file an affidavit of the executive director, Sebi, stating the date on which … Sebi received information regarding the allegations; the date on which the investigation under the Sebi Rules, 1995 was initiated; the date on which the investigation was completed; the date on which the adjudicating officer was appointed; the date on which the show cause notice was issued; and date on which the adjudicatory order was passed,” said the Supreme Court order passed by he two-judge bench comprising justices Sanjiv Khanna and Bela M Trivedi.
“With regard to the dates, if there is any delay and/ or default, an in-house inquiry will be held. Affidavit and the report of the in-house inquiry will be filed at least ten days before the next date of hearing,” said the order. The matter is expected to come up for a hearing in February next year.
In 2013, Sebi conducted an investigation with regard to six preferential allotments made by Alps Motor Finance to look into possible misutilisation of proceeds.Its investigation revealed the company and its whole-time director Brij Kishore Sabharwal, had violated the erstwhile listing agreement (now called Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements Regulations).On January 5 this year, Sebi issued a show cause notice against the company and its director. On May 23, Sebi passed an order imposing a penalty of ₹6 lakh on the company and ₹20 lakh on Sabharwal.
The company challenged Sebi’s order before the Securities Appellate Tribunal. The tribunal set aside the order saying there was an inordinate delay in issuing a show cause notice.
Sebi moved the Supreme Court, challenging the SAT order.